Tag Archives: infrastructure

The Cost of Seattle Water

water-lily-353346_1280

The Cost of Seattle Water

The Seattle water system is a good one, provided by Seattle Public Utilities. But, as the demand grows with urban development and population, the cost of Seattle water will need to rise to support expansion.

A recent article by Gene Balk in the Seattle Times makes some interesting points.  Balk mentions “…bafflingly — drought-stricken Fresno, Calif., has some of the cheapest water in the nation. At a 50-gallon-per-person usage, a family of four would pay just $41.63 — less than one-quarter of the cost in soggy Seattle.”

Balk goes on to write: “Seattle has such high rates because we’ve invested more than most places in our water infrastructure in recent years. We relocated our reservoirs underground, in compliance with federal mandates, to keep our drinking water safe from contaminants. “

We can clearly see that it’s not the amount of Seattle water that is the generator of costs, it is the infrastructure required to convey and treat the water to potable standards.

Approximately 70 % of household water demand is for non potable usage. Irrigation, water closets, laundry, and wash down account for this non potable use. Rainwater collection can mitigate non potable use of city water and have a positive effect on our centralized water system and environment.

The commercial building owner and the home owner can enjoy healthy savings on future Seattle water bills by utilizing rainwater collection. Stormwater reduction could be significantly recognized through on site filtration if buildings and homes in the urban environment adopted rainwater collection .

Seattle is a progressive city in many ways and rainwater collection is part of that progression.

Should Economic Principles Be Applied to Set the Cost of Water?

water-168245_1280In his Forbes article titled: Memo To California: If You’ve A Shortage Of Something Then Change The Price, contributor Tim Wortsall suggests applying economic principles to address the California drought and allow the free market to set and regulate water pricing.

Mr. Wortsall writes: “whereas if you have a scarce commodity, allow the market to dictate the price.  If agricultural industries are using more of this scarce resource, they should pay more for it, or reallocate resources to another product.”

When questioned about his thoughts on the subject, RainBank President Ken Blair stated:

“I agree with Mr. Wortsall. The 25% reduction should absolutely apply to agriculture, it is a business for profit, and if their goods cost more because of higher operating costs, then of course that gets passed onto the customer. If the customer quits buying that product because of higher prices and that affects the business negatively, then they would adjust their products, perhaps using less water and money to produce. Consumers will decide what is grown based on purchasing habits and hopefully would bring about a more sustainable agricultural industry by encouraging producers to grow crops that use less water while offering nutritional value.

Action for this drought has been ignored from local government, business, and the general public primarily because water is cheap. When Gov. Brown asked for voluntary restrictions last year, nothing happened. No one conserved. Lawns are still being watered, farmers continue drilling deeper – impacting ancient aquifers, thousands of years old. The ground is actually dropping. The crisis is well advanced and extreme solutions are late in coming to meet the extreme issue.

“”Each individual has to pay for their consumption choices’ needs to be adjustable, based on use. Basic hygiene and hydration need to be available to all – regardless of wealth, so there should be levels of use – and charged accordingly. Business will take care of itself much like higher gasoline prices have; adjustments will be made. Credits with caps, like carbon, could help by allowing large users to still have access to the resource but still meet conservation goals.”

Ken adds: “Pricing is not the only solution: smart, immediate conservation measures need to be addressed by all – not just large corporations. The unwillingness to change is part of the reason California is now in this crisis.

Adoption of rainwater collection is a good start for the general public, as I wrote about in a blog posts after the recent rain episodes this past winter. The biggest problem, as I see it, is that people are reluctant to change. So – mandatory restrictions, incentives, and education should go hand and hand with pricing.”

To stay on top of rainwater harvesting and rainwater collection information, be sure to  click “Notify me of new posts by email” at the bottom of this page.

Families Shirk Suburbia for Urban Life

In this March 3, 2015 photo, Michael Kelly offers his daughter, Elea, 2, a taste of fresh herbs that he grows at Sprout, the restaurant he owns in Seattle's downtown Pioneer Square neighborhood, as his wife, Jenny, looks on. The Kellys live only a few blocks away, and are a part of a small but growing number of parents who are bucking the trend of moving to suburbs when they have children. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
In this March 3, 2015 photo, Michael Kelly offers his daughter, Elea, 2, a taste of fresh herbs that he grows at Sprout, the restaurant he owns in Seattle’s downtown Pioneer Square neighborhood, as his wife, Jenny, looks on. The Kellys live only a few blocks away, and are a part of a small but growing number of parents who are bucking the trend of moving to suburbs when they have children. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

Seattle’s population composition, along with other cities like Portland, OR could be seeing a trend where young parents opt to remain in,  or return to the city life they enjoyed pre-families.

On March 24th, the Associated Press reported that “A small but growing number of parents are bucking a trend when it comes to raising their kids: Rather than move to suburbs as their parents once did, many are opting to stay in or near downtown. Some do it to seek an urban lifestyle, shorten commutes or be within proximity to restaurants, museums and other attractions.”

Citing a 30% increase in school enrollment between 2007 and  2012, this vocal group has been pushing cities to become friendlier to families – by requesting they add  schools, green space and recreational services to accommodate this growing population.

To read the full article, please click here.